Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 09:53:30 +0200 |
James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>Basicaly, the popular choice was to use the transformational part of XSL >>(dare I call it XQL? :-) to convert XML into CSS+XML/HTML. > >What are we supposed to do about serious print applications? What are we >supposed to do about footnotes, page references, dictionary-style headers, >synchronised marginalia or bi-directional text? You are supposed to either define an XML language which specifies all your printing needs, and use XQL to convert your documents to that (TeXmL would be interesting, for example). Or, if you believe that being able to specify screen and print simultaneously is important (I personally do), you could push for extending the CSS formatting model to include print-specific attributes. You could replace CSS with some other standard formatting model - the XSL proposed one is quite good, actually - but what that have to do with the XQL language? BTW, quite a few "print specific" attributes make sense in a browser environment. Take, for example, page headers and footers. A browser could display a header/footer at the top and bottom of the screen, and update them when you scroll to match the current visible region. This is useful because these regions display valuable navigation information (say, chapter/section information, links to other parts of the document, etc.). Footnotes can be implemented in a browser as pop-up windows containing the footnote text. And so on. Oren Ben-Kiki. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: syntax feedback, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Toivo Lainevool |
Re: An XSL SAX?, Andy Dent | Date | Re: alternating tags in a list?, Andy Dent |
Month |