Subject: Re: xsl:comment and xsl:pi containing template elements? From: Tyler Baker <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 00:09:55 -0500 |
Chris Maden wrote: > [Tyler Baker] > > Why not just have the DTD section for xsl:attribute be changed from: > > > > <!ELEMENT xsl:attribute %template;> > > > > to: > > > > <!ELEMENT xsl:attribute #PCDATA> > > Because you want to use <xsl:value-of/> or some other dynamic thing to > determine the value. Using (#PCDATA) would mean that your > <xsl:attribute> element could only have the same content, ever, and so > every attribute generated by it would have the same value, every > time. Not very useful, then. OK then why not: <ELEMENT xsl:attribute (#PCDATA | xsl:value-of)> Why does the DTD say you can have result element nodes as children, but then it specifically says this is an error. I don't see the rationale here in terms of validation. Tyler XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: xsl:comment and xsl:pi containi, Chris Maden | Thread | Re: xsl:comment and xsl:pi containi, James Clark |
RE: alternating tags in a list?, Didier PH Martin | Date | How to pass an HTML DOM tree to IE5, Amit Rekhi |
Month |