Re: XSL with scripting

Subject: Re: XSL with scripting
From: info@xxxxxxxxxx (Flow Simulation)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:55:47 -0000

Now we have seen the latest XSL draft, and scripting hasn't reappeared.

Since there are obviously strong feelings about this, for and against,
perhaps we should take a vote and send the result to the W3C as
on the transformation/formatting issue.

I think this one would be a simple yes/no.   Any takers?

Bill Ayers (BillA@xxxxxxxxxx)


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, (continued) Gavin Thomas Nicol - Wed, 23 Dec 1998 09:58:25 -0500 Tyler Baker - Wed, 23 Dec 1998 10:49:09 -0500 Didier PH Martin - Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:33:24 -0500 Guy_Murphy - Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:08:22 +0000 Flow Simulation - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:55:47 -0000 <= Didier PH Martin - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:17:28 -0500 Paul Prescod - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:15:44 -0600 Simon St.Laurent - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:32:45 -0500 Paul Prescod - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:51:00 -0600

Current Thread

RE: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, (continued)
- Guy_Murphy - Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:08:22 +0000
- Flow Simulation - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:55:47 -0000 <=
  - Didier PH Martin - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:17:28 -0500
  - Paul Prescod - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:15:44 -0600
    - Simon St.Laurent - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:32:45 -0500
    - Paul Prescod - Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:51:00 -0600

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: FW: XSL with scripting, Guy_Murphy	Thread	RE: XSL with scripting, Didier PH Martin
Why does Ie5b2 expect <xsl:comment>, Amit Rekhi	Date	Re: FW: XSL with scripting, \"Pasqualino \\\"Tit
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home