Subject: Re: XSL with scripting From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 17:45:57 +0700 |
Pawson, David wrote > Still unsure that this is 'right' for XSL, but here goes in reply to James > request. > The scenario is converting XML into embosser ready braille. > > Below is a tranform required which I don't believe can be done with > XSL as is. Some access is needed to another environment to perform > the data changes required. > the input of plain text is converted to ASCII (or Unicode) contracted > text, ready for XSL to formatting. Thanks for the helpful example. I think this is exactly the sort of thing that an extension mechanism ought to be able to deal with. Is all text in a document contracted or can there be some elements whose content is not contracted? Are different contraction rules applied to different parts of the document? Is the contraction process just a matter of mapping each word to an contracted form, or is it more complicated than that? James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL with scripting, Pawson, David | Thread | Re: XSL with scripting, Guy_Murphy |
Re: XSL with scripting, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Why XT doesn't use the DOM, Don Park |
Month |