|
Subject: Re: GOTCHA! From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 14:17:52 +0200 |
From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi Oren.
>
>For output JScript I've been using what MS recommends ie.,
>
> //<xsl:comment>
> <![CDATA[
> ...Script...
> ]]>
> //</xsl:comment>
>
>...which seems to work fine for the IE5b2 parser. Not sure how it would
>fare for XT.
Wouldn't, and rightly so. The fact that there's a CDATA in the input just
protects the characters when being parsed. There's no way in XSL to ask for
a CDATA section in the output. Actually, an <xsl:cdata> tag would be the
closest possible to the <xsl:not-xml> tag I'd like. It falls under the
current intent; it ensures the output is valid XML; it is cleaner then using
the <xsl:comment> tag; and it can be used in the same way to embed non-XML
code in the output.
Any reason we have <xsl:comment> and not <xsl:cdata>? Any chance we may get
<xsl:cdata>?
Have fun,
Oren Ben-Kiki
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: GOTCHA!, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: GOTCHA!, Tyler Baker |
| Re: Feature Suggestion - result sub, James Clark | Date | Re: GOTCHA!, Oren Ben-Kiki |
| Month |