Subject: Re: Venting From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:04:02 -0500 (EST) |
[Sean McGrath] > Maybe I've missed something and someone can provide a pointer, but I > have not heard any noises from Microsoft about implementing FO's in > XSL in IE. My impression from Microsoft's stuff is that they see XSL > as a way of generating HTML - a transformation language only. To me, this is an argument for keeping the specs together. I don't want a browser that doesn't implement FOs to be able to claim XSL compliance. (Given various browsers' track records, that probably won't stop them. Does anyone remember "HTML 3.0 compatible!"?) -Chris -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Sean Mc Grath | Thread | Re: Venting, Paul Prescod |
Re: Venting, John E. Simpson | Date | RE: venting, Didier PH Martin |
Month |