Subject: Re: About Microsoft Patent From: Tyler Baker <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 01:18:03 -0500 |
Paul Prescod wrote: > Didier PH Martin wrote: > > > > Yep, this has, for sure implications to XSL with FO not as XSL as a > > transformation language which is not covered by the patent. I guess this add > > more weight to the actual thread about splitting XSL from the formatting > > object stuff. > > I refuse to get my nighty in a knot about an unsupportable patent. Just > because the monkeys in the patent office will approve anything doesn't > mean that a judge will back them. Microsoft would also look pretty silly > defending such a stupid pattent -- and losing. Then why on earth, other than for the purpose of instilling fear and stifle innovation in the XML/XSL Community would MS bother with the patent in the first place. Just another example of a large company using the US patent office for all of the wrong reasons. If MS took a small ISV to court, an ISV would spend its entire budget just defending itself, even though the case may be thrown out eventually. Plain and simple this patent has the obvious intent of being a tool of fear. On CNN/Fortune Newstand (a US news program on the cable TV channel CNN on Wednesday nights at 10:00 PM EST) not long ago they talked about one of the most recent small ISV's to get lawyered to death by Microsoft. So the issue is, if you are a small ISV and you are thinking about releasing an XSL Processor with "styling", you have to think twice about going up against an entity with an unlimited legal budget to cream you with. As everyone already knows, any past judgements against MS, whether it be Stac or anyone else were pyrhic victories. In the end many of these companies died off after many years of time and many millions of dollars playing legal twister with Microsoft. Sorry to be such a pessimist Paul, but this seems to be just more of the same from Microsoft. Tyler XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: About Microsoft Patent, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: About Microsoft Patent, Paul Prescod |
Re: Accessing XSL context - Was: RE, Paul Prescod | Date | RE: Venting, Pawson, David |
Month |