Subject: RE: Venting From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:01:43 +0000 |
Hi. We're just going to have to agree to differ here :) IMHO HTML|XML&CSS for rendering doesn't begin to compete with FOs, and certainly the print design chaps I've spoke to respond with horror to the suggestion that CSS should suffice their needs. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/11/99 10:11:52 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: RE: Venting At 05:09 PM 2/11/99 +0000, you wrote: >I have played with XML+CSS in IE5, and while it's useful with maybe IE5 >behaviours for producing "widgets" (I produced a collapsable navigation >menu, from XML data), I'm not overly enamoured at the prospect of complex >rendering using this approach. I appreciate others may differ, but I'm sure >that print designers wont like being told XML+CSS is the solution they >should adopt. CSS1? Probably not. CSS2? No problem. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April) Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
RE: XML/XSL parsers, Mark Birbeck | Date | Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
Month |