|
Subject: RE: Venting From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:01:43 +0000 |
Hi.
We're just going to have to agree to differ here :)
IMHO HTML|XML&CSS for rendering doesn't begin to compete with FOs, and
certainly the print design chaps I've spoke to respond with horror to the
suggestion that CSS should suffice their needs.
Cheers
Guy.
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/11/99 10:11:52 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject: RE: Venting
At 05:09 PM 2/11/99 +0000, you wrote:
>I have played with XML+CSS in IE5, and while it's useful with maybe IE5
>behaviours for producing "widgets" (I produced a collapsable navigation
>menu, from XML data), I'm not overly enamoured at the prospect of complex
>rendering using this approach. I appreciate others may differ, but I'm
sure
>that print designers wont like being told XML+CSS is the solution they
>should adopt.
CSS1? Probably not. CSS2? No problem.
Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Venting, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Thread | Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
| RE: XML/XSL parsers, Mark Birbeck | Date | Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
| Month |