Subject: Re: What about IE5 From: hluna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Horacio Luna) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:10:19 -0600 |
Thanks Didier, nice review... Any way I feel disappointed, I expected more about the xlm stuff... guess netscape will not be much diferent in that aspect, they care more about the people who browse the web, and as xlm isnt as popular and needed as html/javascript, they will not support it as some people like us expect. Ill take your advice, I dont like IE too much to browse the web, but as you said(sort of): something is better than nothing :) Regards Horacio <snip> > ON the XSL side, nothing changed. I guess > that they still consider XSL as an experiment (the spec is not officially > out). About XML: I didn't noticed anything that doesn't respect the W3C XML > 1.0 spec. If the document includes a DTD it is validated, if not, it is not. > CSS support is a lot better than in the previous version. We got several CSS > scripts that where not working with the last version that now work with this > one. </snip> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: What about IE5, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: What about IE5, Guy_Murphy |
Re: template matching.. display the, Marcus Carr | Date | Re: template matching.. display the, Sara Mitchell |
Month |