Subject: Re: transforming links for different streams From: "Richard Lander" <rlander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 15:35:06 -0500 |
Actually, I was not thinking of this sort of system at all. I was thinking about using XT to produce static web document, as opposed to anything dynamic. From what you've said, I would assume that I could set a value in my SS, to either XML or HTML, then use a script to take care of building the links properly. Sounds good, Thanks. Richard. ----- Original Message ----- From: Duane Nickull <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 12:06 PM Subject: Re: transforming links for different streams > Richard Lander wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > For the next while, content providers are likely to be publishing XML and > > HTML documents. As we all know, the best method is to author in XML then > > publish to XML and HTML. If a content provider is authoring several XML > > documents that make up a site and wishes to link between them, then how does > > the linking work? This provider will want xml docs to link to xml docs and > > the same with HTML but with html docs. Is there a way of transforming docs > > with XSL to force the extensions of the values of links? > > > Richard: > > I would do this by writing a script into your xsl document that read the > clients browser type and provided a filename extension for the link > based on whether or not they have an XML cabaple browser. > > This is relatively straightforward and simple. > > Duane Nickull > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: transforming links for differen, Duane Nickull | Thread | Last (first, and only) call: XML/DO, Jon Bosak |
Re: XML is broken (was Re: Why Does, Sara Mitchell | Date | Re: XML is broken (was Re: Why Does, Simon St.Laurent |
Month |