Subject: RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken) From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 22:36:17 -0400 |
> That's pretty much what an XPDL file looks like, with hrefs > pointing to all sizable chunks of information. It's not a manifest for a particular > document (it's referenced by the document, rather than it > referencing the document), but that functionality wouldn't be difficult to add for > particular use-cases. > The best thing is to allow a catalog to reference a catalog (James Clark did something like this with the DELEGATE proposal). FWIW. I do not think that you should have *only* pull, or *only* packages/closures. Mixed mode is also good. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), Simon St.Laurent | Thread | RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), Gavin Thomas Nicol |
RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), Gavin Thomas Nicol | Date | RE: XPDL (was Re: XML is broken), Gavin Thomas Nicol |
Month |