Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 04:18:24 -0500 |
Jonathan Borden wrote: > > So you are saying that it is possible to create a transformation which > takes an arbitrary XFO -> XHTML and back i.e. No. I only claim that that is the case for *abstract* information. I can't provide a generalized definition of abstract information but in this context we can use this one: "the information required to drive non-graphical renditions of the information." >From a graphical point of view, XFOs have a few features that XHTML+CSS do not. I cannot enumerate these exhaustively, however. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have performed better had it been tuned." "Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that research was sponsored by Micorosft." http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/1999/9904221410.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Formatting Objects considered h, Jonathan Borden | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Paul Prescod |
Re: XSL and Web Native distributed , Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Paul Prescod |
Month |