Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:19:35 -0400 |
At 05:43 PM 4/28/99 +0100, Guy Murphy wrote: >1. Are you commiting to the arguement that use of a "semantic firewall" is >a "bad thing" and that the W3C should take steps to stop such a practice? I'm saying the use of such semantic firewalls basically kills off the arguments behind the creation of XML by the W3C - delivering _meaningful_ generic markup over the Web. Hiding your semantics or charging for them is putting up a wall to intelligent search engines and agents as well as cheapskates. The self-interest of the business behind the semantic firewall is well-served, but the community is poorly served. >2. Are you suggesting that the W3C should impede what you have previously >stated to be a sound business case? I said it was a good business plan, but I hardly support every good business plan. For the reasons stated above, I certainly hope the W3C - toothless though it is - discourages such practices. >3. Are you suggesting that the W3C should take steps to discourage large >corporates from placing their data on the Web? In this form, yes. text/xfo or whatever is a significant step down from HTML, and doesn't begin to deliver on the promise of XML. In reality, I expect them to do nothing of the sort. But they could always surprise me... Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Paul Prescod |
Re: XSL is difficult to...?[readabi, Matt MacKenzie | Date | RE: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Simon St.Laurent |
Month |