Subject: Re: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:38:03 -0500 |
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > > At 02:54 PM 4/28/99 -0500, you wrote: > >You are missing an important part of Guy's argument. In some cases you the > >consumer have a choice of only the dumbed-down information or none at all. > >The W3C has no hope of changing the business model of these companies and > >it is highly debatable whether they should be trying. > > If that's genuinely the case, it seems that XML has been grossly oversold > as cure for the problems of the Web. The W3C creates technologies to *enable* more exciting, powerful uses of the Web. They cannot *require* that people use their technologies or use them properly. > I find it highly ironic that XSL, > with its transformations and formatting objects, is so readily capable of > blocking the move toward a meaningful Web that XML was supposed to provide. Data-dumbing has been going on since there was CGI. Now companies have the choice to send out smart data. Some will choose to do so. Some will choose to charge money for that service. That is a major step forward. > We already have advertisements, which seem to occupy about 50% of my Web > visits. If selling semantics is going to be a viable business model, we'd > better get back to those micropayments... I agree! Micropayments are an important part of the solution. There is a subtletly that we are passing over here. When a client sends me information in their corporate DTD it takes me about half a day to wrap my head around it enough to be able to do something useful with it. You can't throw it into a search engine or word processor and expect to be able to do anything useful with it. To make it useful, either the customer or I must map it to some more generally known data model -- either a display data model like FOs, or a search model. What that means is that forcing (even by law!) corporations to expose their internal data would not move us toward a semantically searchable web unless those corporations or some third party went through aa complex process of structure-mapping. In other words, the semantic web can only be built if corporations choose to build business models that support it. It doesn't happen just by exposing the underlying data. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Microsoft spokesman Ian Hatton admits that the Linux system would have performed better had it been tuned." "Future press releases on the issue will clearly state that the research was sponsored by Microsoft." http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/1999/9904221410.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Simon St.Laurent | Thread | Re: Formatting Objects considered h, Simon St.Laurent |
Re: Transformation + FOs makes abus, Chuck White | Date | Re: XSL is difficult to...?, Paul Prescod |
Month |