Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...

Subject: Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...
From: "Don Park" <donpark@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:04:08 -0700
> If however, we had a script tag, that we could escape to for those
> but essential tasks, might we not have exactly that, an escape. Something
> outside of XSL? In this way XSL could retain its "purity", and be
> implimented where needed in a robust, simple form, unadulterated, but
> catering for expedience outside of the XSL language itself with the script
> tag.

Another path to take might be to propose a separate standard script tag
and/or a guideline for adding scripting language support in XML formats.

<xml:script> anyone?


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread