Subject: Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script... From: "Don Park" <donpark@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 07:04:08 -0700 |
> If however, we had a script tag, that we could escape to for those marginal > but essential tasks, might we not have exactly that, an escape. Something > outside of XSL? In this way XSL could retain its "purity", and be > implimented where needed in a robust, simple form, unadulterated, but still > catering for expedience outside of the XSL language itself with the script > tag. Another path to take might be to propose a separate standard script tag and/or a guideline for adding scripting language support in XML formats. <xml:script> anyone? Don XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XML and ASP, Duane Nickull | Thread | Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, Duane Nickull |
RE: XML and ASP, Guy_Murphy | Date | RE: XML and ASP, Vun Kannon, David |
Month |