Subject: Re: <xsl-script> From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 02:20:20 -0500 |
Marcus Carr wrote: > > I realise that it's off-track, but I'd be interested if you would outline a > couple of these differences. They don't jump up and grab me, though I'm > admittedly not as fluent in XSL as I would like to be. XSL's strength and weakness is that it provides access to the entire tree at once. As an extreme example, it is easy in XSL to write a script that reverses the order of elements in a document but I imagine that would be quite difficult in Omnimark. XSL has a highly sophisticated query language built-in with full tree access. On the other hand, Omnimark is likely to be more efficient because it doesn't depend on having the entire tree. Omnimark's textual patten matching is also much more sophisticated. Not many people use XSL for conversion INTO XML from something else. because it is not set up to do that easily. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco The dress code in Las Cruces New Mexico has been tightened [to] target Gothic clothing, such as dark trench coats. "It is not a witch hunt" Superintendent Jesse L. Gozales said. "It is for the safety of the kids in our schools." - Associated Press, May 16 1999 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: <xsl-script>, Marcus Carr | Thread | Announcement: OmniMark is Free, Marcus Carr |
Re: XSLT draft interpretation quest, James Clark | Date | xsl:variable, Bovone Stefano |
Month |