Subject: RE: Microsoft's take on XSL From: Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:53:54 -0400 (EST) |
At 14 Jul 1999 14:24 +0000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > Julian Reschke writes: > > > The migration story for XSL is that we will continue to support the IE5.0 > > > XSL namespace with the IE5 behavior and then we will also support the new > > > XSLT namespace with the XSLT defined behavior. Arn't namespaces wonderful > > and this. my style sheet says > > xmlns:xsl='http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0' > > so my things start "<xsl:", just like Microsoft's do. are they saying > that instead I will do It's not the prefix that's important, it's the URI reference for which the prefix is a shorthand that counts. Stylesheets with: <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" result-ns=""> and stylesheets with: <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" result-ns=""> are using different namespaces -- different URI references -- for the XSLT elements and attributes, even though they both use the "xsl" prefix. I would also predict that XSLT version 1.1 will use: <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" result-ns=""> so XSLT processors can disambiguate XSLT 1.0 stylesheets and XSLT 1.1 stylesheets. As the quoted message says, aren't namespaces wonderful! Regards, Tony Graham ====================================================================== Tony Graham mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9632 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Microsoft's take on XSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: Microsoft's take on XSL, Julian Reschke |
RE: Microsoft's take on XSL, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Russell Allen |
Month |