Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables)

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables)

Subject: Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables)
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:51:35 +0100 (BST)

James Robertson writes:

 > XSLT is just too wierd for most programmers

Ironic, isn't it. The whole XSL thing started because people said
DSSSL's Lisp was "just too wierd for most programmers". No pleasing
some folk.

 > People like CSS.

I have never met anyone who liked CSS. This (fairly meaningless)
statement has at least the virtue of being true (subject to memory
limitations), where "People like CSS" is a pure guess.

Sebastian

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables), (continued) Rick Geimer - Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:22:14 -0700 Simon St.Laurent - Thu, 14 Oct 1999 14:33:10 -0400 Sebastian Rahtz - Thu, 14 Oct 1999 20:06:00 +0100 (BST) James Robertson - Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:18:33 +1000 Sebastian Rahtz - Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:51:35 +0100 (BST) <= James Robertson - Fri, 15 Oct 1999 19:01:49 +1000 Miloslav Nic - Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:16:57 +0200 Paul Prescod - Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:10:05 -0400 Didier PH Martin - Sat, 16 Oct 1999 09:27:36 -0400

Current Thread

Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , James Robertson	Thread	Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , James Robertson
RE: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , Linda van den Brink	Date	Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , James Robertson
	Month