Subject: Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables) From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:16:57 +0200 |
> So, getting this back to my original question: > > "Who exactly is being kept happy by XSLT and XSL:FO?" > I am being kept happy by XSLT and I hope I will be when it is implemented with XSL:FO There are some tasks , where it is just excellent, and some others where it is not. A Larry Wall quote: (http://www2.linuxjournal.com/cgi-bin/frames.pl/lj-issues/issue61/3394.html) I truly believe computer programmers want to be creative, and they may have many different reasons for wanting to write code a particular way. What you choose to optimize for is your concern, not mine. I just supply the paint--you paint the picture. -- *************************************************************** Dr. Miloslav Nic e-mail: nicmila@xxxxxxxx Department of Organic Chemistry TEL: +420 2 2435 5012 ICT Prague (VSCHT Praha) +420 2 2435 4118 FAX: +420 2 2435 4288 **************************************************************** Support free information exchange: http://zvon.vscht.cz **************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , James Robertson | Thread | Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , Paul Prescod |
OpenXML/XSL:P some problem, Alexandre Trusch | Date | Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , Robert Barta |
Month |