Subject: Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists as tables) From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 13:33:39 +0200 (Europe de l'Ouest (Heure d'été)) |
Also sprach James Tauber: > I'd like to see it happen. Back when FOP was written in Python, Lars Marius > Garshol and I were talking about a CSS version. Interestingly, adding CSS > support to FOP means treating CSS as defining formatting objects, which it > does in many respects, although Hakon Lie might not see it that way :-) No, I do see it that way. If you look closely in the the CSS2 Recommedation [1] you'll even find the term "formatting object" used. I think it would be great if FOP supports CSS through formatting objects. My problems [2] with formatting objects start when people make syntaxes for them and put them on the web. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2 [2] http://www.opera.com/people/howcome/1999/foch.html -h&kon Chief Technology Officer Opera Software Håkon Wium Lie http://www.opera.com/people/howcome howcome@xxxxxxxxx gets you there faster XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , Steve Schafer | Thread | Re: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , James Tauber |
Re: FO. lists as tables. Re: Q: XML, Håkon Wium Lie | Date | RE: Nostradamus (was Re: FO. lists , Didier PH Martin |
Month |