Subject: Re: EZ/X Speed: Rebunking Oracle's Debunk: WAS (Getting Some Facts Straight on Performance Claims) From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 09:34:31 +0800 |
> WHO'S FASTEST? > First, however, before any major flame erupts about Java XSL speed, Cool, a flame war I'm not involved in. *whoops* too late. > Activated Intelligence wants to acknowledge that the current speed leader is > James Clark's XT - a fine package and worthy of respect for many reasons. We > do not claim EZ/XSL to be faster than XT yet <grin>, though our EZ/XML > parser speeds past his XP parser package... What is your parser's conformance like? While I am not doubting your ability to write a faster parser than XP... all other things being equal, parsers faster than XP generally get their speed by dropping some requirements in the spec. James Tauber XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
EZ/X Speed: Rebunking Oracle's Debu, Michael Sick | Thread | Re: EZ/X Speed: Rebunking Oracle's , Rick Ross |
Re: FOP 0.12, James Tauber | Date | Another newbie question, Sanjay Saxena |
Month |