Re: EZ/X Speed: Rebunking Oracle's Debunk: WAS (Getting Some Facts Straight on Performance Claims)

Subject: Re: EZ/X Speed: Rebunking Oracle's Debunk: WAS (Getting Some Facts Straight on Performance Claims)
From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 10:42:23 +0800
> EZ/XML conformance, as measured by the oasis-open test suite, should be
> pretty reasonable. I think we are presently passing 967 of the 1065 tests.
> According to David Brownell's recent article at XML.com this would place
> EZ/X behind only his parser and XP for conformance.
>
> Of course, we target perfection and expect to eliminate any remaining
areas
> of non-conformance as we continue development.

Great! Keep up to good work.

James Tauber

PS Sorry to briefly go off topic for this XSL list.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread