Subject: Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc differently From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:31:42 +0100 (BST) |
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2000, Miloslav Nic wrote: > > > I just run to this. > > > > By now I thought that //foo is an abbrev form of /descendant::foo > > /descendant-or-self::foo Damnit, I meant of course: /descendant-or-self::node()/foo Must drink more coffee before responding to emails. -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Matt Sergeant | Thread | Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, David Carlisle |
re: mixed content styling problem, Bill dehOra | Date | Re: How would you add depth to this, Jeni Tennison |
Month |