Subject: Re: Context node/Predicates in Expressions From: John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 12:44:22 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 26 May 2000, David Carlisle wrote: > Since all elements are the child of some node, this last clause doesn't > make any extra restriction in this case. > > In general a node, x, is matched by a pattern match="p" if there exists a > node, N, in the source tree, such that if you took N as the context node > then x would be in the node set returned by select="p". > David- I missed somehting here. "node x" happens to be matchable by 'match="p"' because hte node x you are thinking of has the element type name of "p", right? just want to be sure I got this. jr XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, Mike Brown |
RE: Matching Attributes with @, John Robert Gardner | Date | RE: How to escape character when us, Hien Luu |
Month |