Subject: Re: Context node/Predicates in Expressions From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 11:01:51 -0600 (MDT) |
> "body" matches > node in the current node list that > has name body and is in the null namespace and for which there exists > some node, N, anywhere in the source tree such that the body element is a > child of N. Oh, interesting. I'm sure that is not the only thing wrong with my late-night, untested, should've-had-the-spec-in-front-of-me explanation for John. I'm pretty confident that I butchered the true XPath meaning of "pattern" as well. > Since all elements are the child of some node, this last clause doesn't > make any extra restriction in this case. Is node() allowable in a match pattern? If so, it would follow that the last clause would prevent the root node from matching it. - Mike ___________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer, Webb Interactive Services XML/XSL stuff: http://www.skew.org/ http://www.webb.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Context node/Predicates in Expr, John Robert Gardner | Thread | Re: ### Outputting the "full path"., Jeni Tennison |
RE: How to escape character when us, Hien Luu | Date | RE: Matching Attributes with @, Kay Michael |
Month |