Re: XSLT engine performance


Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> 
> Matt Sergeant writes:

>   > I'd also like to see some more realistic tests, such
>  > as transforming smaller documents lots of times (like a dynamic XML web
>  > server might do).
> 
> why do you consider that more `realistic', pray? those of us who
> consider XML and XSLT mere vehicles for transforming gravestone data
> are not so interested in a dynamic web server transforming smaller
> documents lots of times.

I agree. Realistic to me means transforming medium to large documents (
100k - 5Megs ) a few hundred times a day. Guess it all comes down to
what you use XML for. 

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
XSLT engine performance, (continued) Sebastian Rahtz - Wed, 26 Jul 2000 16:16:12 +0100 (BST) Matt Sergeant - Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:30:29 +0100 (BST) Paul Tchistopolskii - Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:23:30 -0700 Sebastian Rahtz - Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:21:37 +0100 (BST) Rick Geimer - Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:54:08 -0700 <= Matt Sergeant - Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:32:51 +0100 (BST) Gary L Peskin - Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:59:31 -0700 Gary L Peskin - Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:48:44 -0700

Current Thread

XSLT engine performance, (continued)
- Gary L Peskin - Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:59:31 -0700
  - Gary L Peskin - Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:48:44 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT engine performance, Sebastian Rahtz	Thread	Re: XSLT engine performance, Matt Sergeant
RE: MSXML3: Numerical sort needed.., Julian Reschke	Date	RE: current() of current(), Kay Michael
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home