Subject: Re: XSLT engine performance From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:32:51 +0100 (BST) |
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > I'd also like to see some more realistic tests, such > > as transforming smaller documents lots of times (like a dynamic XML web > > server might do). > > why do you consider that more `realistic', pray? those of us who > consider XML and XSLT mere vehicles for transforming gravestone data > are not so interested in a dynamic web server transforming smaller > documents lots of times. My bad wording... I guess my assumption is that most people are using XML+XSLT for HTML page building, and that most of them will be investigating some sort of servlet or in-process architecture to do so. I'm sure there are lots of exceptions to that rule. Benchmarks are *hard* to produce really valid data. Often the better benchmark for a lot of people is which XSLT engines conform most closely to the spec (to which we all know the answer is Saxon, I think). But they can be interesting nonetheless. -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org | AxKit: http://axkit.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT engine performance, Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: Stylesheet assistance, Gary L Peskin |
RE: MSXML3: order-by, Joshua Allen | Date | RE: Plain text output., Pawson, David |
Month |