RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages

["Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Terray 

> Conclusion :


> - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory
> - For XML -> any other format, Omnimark is probably better

For (OM terminology) up transforms OM is really good,
 'a poor mans perl'? (certainly easier to learn)
For XML -> any other format.... I'd caveat that with a rider,
   Only if control type (non xml) output needed,
   and probably better to determine on a wider basis, e.g.
   what complexity of transform, what access to source data.
  I find this argument weaker.

DaveP,
now having 0.02euro's worth:-)


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list