<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages

Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:29:54 +1000
At 23:03 7/09/2000, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:

> OmniMark advantages :
> - Less resource hogging

I beg to differ. Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program. 

I think Omnimark will take as much memory is
available, but no more.

How much memory would be required when using
XSLT to parse 150Mb? (Several gig?)

J


-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Rick Geimer Thread Re: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Rick Geimer
RE: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, James Robertson Date RE: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Matthew Bentley
Month