Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:03:33 +0200 |
> OmniMark advantages : > - Less resource hogging I beg to differ. Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program. Additionally Omnimark has serious trouble with underscores in element-names. Apparenly XML-input data has to conform to a DTD, which does not always apply for our data. > - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory Not entirely so. XML is very easy to generate with Perl, and it is equally easy to parse a lot of non-complex text formats in Perl (if you can put it in a regular expression). Parsing XML with Perl is rather slow, though. -- Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...and...Tubular Bells!" http://bigfoot.com/~thunderbear XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Pawson, David | Thread | Re: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Dan Vint |
RE: Microsoft.XMLDOM load method on, Chris Bayes | Date | Re: xsl-fo: dynamic headers with ov, Harald Weyhing |
Month |