Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages From: Matthew Bentley <Matthew.bentley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 10:08:45 +1200 |
>> I'll have to play around with your CDATA hack...it looks promising, but >> it is still a hack for something that should be included in the XSLT >> data model. >I would not want to rely on an XSLT processor's XML output method being >lenient about serializing a text node child of the root node; it would not >be a well-formed document if the serialized form of the node were anything >other than whitespace, a comment or document type declaration. An XML >output method must emit a well-formed document. I don't know what you're talking about, but its certainly nothing to do with the solution I was suggesting - M@ ****************************************************************** Warning: This email, including any attachments, is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups or web pages, is strictly prohibited without the express prior consent of Brooker's Limited. ****************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Rick Geimer | Thread | RE: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Matthew Bentley |
RE: 1 xml to 2 html, Richard Lander | Date | RE: XSLT and Text Processing Langua, Matthew Bentley |
Month |