Subject: RE: XSLT V 1.1 From: Eckenberger Axel <Extern.Eckenberger@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:56:44 +0200 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Tchistopolskii [mailto:paul@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 8:44 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: XSLT V 1.1 > > I second Davids proposal that there should be a standard > > interface to the various URI's > > present in the processor. In a recent discussion we traced a problem to the fact that neither the stylesheet, nor the xml-document did have a file representation and were in-memory only. As document was feeded with a relative URI the stylesheet could not be parsed, because the URI of the sylesheet could not be retrieved (no file !!!). If there would be a standard way of determinig the URI of the stylesheet, it could be tested whether the stylesheet has an URI or not and if not the error could be processed. For this reason I too second David's proposal. ------------snip ------------------ > My solution is: > > 1. Provide XSL stylesheet with URI of 'XML' and 'XSL'. > 2. Resolve all URI's in document() relatively to 'XML' > and 'xsl:import' 'xsl:include' relatively to 'XSL' > 3. For other (weird) cases - calculate the desired > URI by yourself. > > Yes, (3) requires XSL Engine to provide 2 > parameters to each stylesheet. Like : > "current-xsl" and "current-xml". > > Or "$argv0" and "$argv1". Or add 2 more functions, > like get-xsl-uri() and get-xml-uri(). > > 2 more parameters will be better than 2 more functions, > from my point of view and will be better than current > document(). The problem is that you look at the topic from a point of view where you have files, but if you use XML within components (via the DOM) you might not have them and IMHO this is not a 'weied' case. I agree that there should be a way of determinig the URI for a node (and a way of determining whether ther is _no_ URI, see above). Hovever, I do not agree with you that it should be the document function's default behaviour to resolve relative paths relative to the xml document. ------------snip ------------------ > Rgds.Paul. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT V 1.1, Eckenberger Axel | Thread | Re: XSLT V 1.1, Paul Tchistopolskii |
RE: XSLT V 1.1, Eckenberger Axel | Date | RE: union elements in multiple xml , Eckenberger Axel |
Month |