|
Subject: RE: testing node type From: "Jarno Elovirta" <jarno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:02:28 +0300 |
> Pawson, David writes: > > name() returns an empty string if its a comment. > > <xsl:variable name="empty" /> > > <xsl:if test="name( following-sibling::node()[1]) =$empty"> > > but name() also returns empty if its a processing-instruction, doesnt > it? ditto text() > > but yes, may I could make that work but shouldn't <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]"> do the trick? or did i misunderstood the question? Jarno XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: testing node type, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: testing node type, Sebastian Rahtz |
| Re: testing node type, Tobias Grundmann | Date | Mac XSLT processor?, Conor Ryan |
| Month |