Subject: RE: testing node type From: "Jarno Elovirta" <jarno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:32:11 +0300 |
> > > <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]"> > ... > >...yes, that *is* what I wanted > > I think following-sibling::node()[1]/self::comment() should work as well. > Interesting to notice why. I tried to compare the processing time of both with a 3MB source file and a style sheet that just did that test to every node, but I didn't have time to do a proper test and the results weren't valid. So, implementor out there, can you tell me which is _theoretically_ faster? I mean in practice you can't see the difference, so the question is purely academic. Jarno XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: testing node type, Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: testing node type, Pawson, David |
RE: testing node type, Kay Michael | Date | Re: template match using mode with , Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Month |