|
Subject: RE: testing node type From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 16:56:46 -0400 (EST) |
Sebastian, At 01:17 PM 9/22/00 +0100, you wrote: >Jarno Elovirta writes: ... > > <xsl:if test="following-sibling::node()[1][self::comment()]"> ... >...yes, that *is* what I wanted I think following-sibling::node()[1]/self::comment() should work as well. Interesting to notice why. Cheers, Wendell ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: testing node type, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: testing node type, Jarno Elovirta |
| Re: Forcing String Length?, Stephen Zisk | Date | Re: Forcing String Length?, Wendell Piez |
| Month |