Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:18:03 +0100
> In all examples and recommendations  (well not all, but most of them) 
> they suggest using the ns, but
> that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those 
> recomendations all dated,

You have that entirely backwards.
is the standard XSL language which is supported by all current XSL
systems (Including Microsoft's). is
a completely different incompatible language thatis not supported on any
platform other than Microsoft (and even there only for compatibility
with version 2 of their parser)

>  or is there any good reason for using that 
> instead of ?


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread