Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:18:03 +0100 |
> In all examples and recommendations (well not all, but most of them) > they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but > that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those > recomendations all dated, You have that entirely backwards. http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform is the standard XSL language which is supported by all current XSL systems (Including Microsoft's). http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl is a completely different incompatible language thatis not supported on any platform other than Microsoft (and even there only for compatibility with version 2 of their parser) > or is there any good reason for using that > instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ? > Yes. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] [ANN] A belated annoucement o, Khun Yee Fung | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused, Chris Bayes |
Re: [xsl] multi-level grouping trou, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] MS XMLDOM not transforming my, Daniel Newman |
Month |