Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:29:11 +0100
> msxml3.dll. However the ProgID remained Msxml2.DOMDocument

er yes I know:-) But It's clearer to say version 3 I think, as that leads
people to the right download pages.

> So if by MSXML3 you mean MSXML v3.0 then you suppose wrong because MSXML
> v2.6 supports 1999/XSL/Transform too.

er does 2.6 really support XSLT? If so how much? As I recall the web
releases started off with rather minimal support but improved rapidly
and so the final september web release and the production release of
msxml3 are of course pretty good. But if your list is in chronological
order 2.6 came out between the first and second betas of msxml3.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread