Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:29:11 +0100 |
> msxml3.dll. However the ProgID remained Msxml2.DOMDocument er yes I know:-) But It's clearer to say version 3 I think, as that leads people to the right download pages. > So if by MSXML3 you mean MSXML v3.0 then you suppose wrong because MSXML > v2.6 supports 1999/XSL/Transform too. er does 2.6 really support XSLT? If so how much? As I recall the web releases started off with rather minimal support but improved rapidly and so the final september web release and the production release of msxml3 are of course pretty good. But if your list is in chronological order 2.6 came out between the first and second betas of msxml3. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused, Chris Bayes | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused, Chris Bayes |
RE: [xsl] Latest XSLTMark benchmark, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] position(), Wendell Piez |
Month |