Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused From: "Ralof" <ralof@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:57:42 +0200 |
Thank you all for your effort, I am a little bit less confused now. :) Maybe that XSL Processor Version page at http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/processor-version.xsl should be a little bit more informative? I mean, "You are using Microsoft IE 5 or older..." (I have put my MSXML 3.0 in replace mode now, so don't remeber the exact wording on that page), does not even sound bad, at least it did not give any hint to suggest that I was using dated components. What really made me fall deep into to daze & confusion was that I was running my MSXML 3 in side by side mode for some reason (it installs like that I suppose) and I was sure I was running the latest version. After reading the FAQ link I realized the difference between side by side and replace and put my MSXML in repl... This does not really make sense, does it? :) I think XML's only reason for being here is to turn our brains into something that can only go "huh?". David pointed out: > You have that entirely backwards. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused, Chris Bayes | Thread | Re: [xsl] illegal xhtml attributes?, cutlass |
RE: [xsl] position(), Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused, Chris Bayes |
Month |