Re: [xsl] position within same nodes

Subject: Re: [xsl] position within same nodes
From: Laurence O Garfield <lgarfiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:59:57 -0500 (CDT)
> Larry,
> Try (count(preceding-sibling::meep)+1), or
> (count(preceding-sibling::*[name()=name(current())])+1) for the general case.
> <xsl:number/> is another way to go. It can get fairly complex (look it up
> in the spec), but in this case you shouldn't need any attributes to
> configure the counting: it'll default to what you want. Bind it to a
> variable if you need to retrieve it through XPath.
> Cheers,
> Wendell

Thanks, Wendell!  They both worked perfectly.  I decided to go with
<xsl:number /> because it seemed more elegant/readable-1-year-from-now.

--Larry Garfield

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread