Subject: Re: [xsl] literal result element as stylesheet with JavaScript? From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:32:28 +0000 |
Hi Dan, > I am suspecting that <msxsl:script> must be a "top-level" element > and may be impossilbe within 'literal result element as stylesheet'. I believe you are suspecting correctly. > Are there any workarounds? You could run the simplified stylesheet through another stylesheet that would generate the full stylesheet from it, extracting the embedded msxsl:script and placing it in the right place. I don't know why you're using a simplified stylesheet, but if it's to enable other users to write them more easily, then this would be an option. If you're trying to simplify it for your sake, of course, writing a stylesheet that processes your stylesheet is way more trouble than you're avoiding using a simplified stylesheet :) Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] literal result element as, cutlass | Thread | Re: [xsl] literal result element as, Dan Diebolt |
[xsl] space between two prints ?, ArA | Date | Re: [xsl] Outputting literal and 'q, Jörg Heinicke |
Month |