[xsl] RE: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is being displayed as Á

Subject: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is being displayed as Á
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:35:53 +0100
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kevin Burges
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:17 PM
> To: David Carlisle
> Subject: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl] &#160; is
> being displayed as Á
>
>
>
> >> I don't understand. When I put the output into IE it displays " ". The
>
> DC> in that case you must have used disable-output-encoding,
> without telling
> DC> us.
>
> Yes sorry, I forgot to write that in the post.
>
> DC>  Searching the archives of this list will show you plenty of
> DC> messages discussing d-o-e, and why usually it's a bad idea.
>
> I've been reading most of the posts, and I understand why in most
> cases it is bad. I don't particularly see why it is bad in my
> example where I just want to create a &#160; in an HTML file so it can
> be understood easier by IE.

For instance, it won't work in Mozilla.

Why not just stick with the portable method?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread