Subject: [xsl] Re: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl]   is being displayed as Á From: Kevin Burges <xmldude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:45:36 +0000 |
[David] DC> d-o-e doesn't work in (say) mozilla, you get no warning: you just get DC> what you asked for, the characters [Julian] JR> So you prefer to make your XSLT non-portable so that it will work in JR> mis-configured IEs? Although this will make it unusable in the "other" JR> browser? The difference is that I am not doing the transformation in the browser. I am using MSXML through a VB program to produce the HTML on my computer only. The HTML is then given (mailed or on disc) to someone else to view in IE. The only thing that needs d-o-e is MSXML. I understand that this is just my specific circumstances, and in others it may not be a good solution. Although I still assert that in my circumstances the d-o-e solution works, I have now changed it to use simply   and give a Content-Type meta tag. When using iso-8859-1 this works, but if I try UTF-8 IE seems to still have some recognition problems. Not a problem though, iso-8859-1 is fine for me. Thanks everybody for the comments, especially Jeni's monster explanation. Hopefully this can draw to an end soon? -- groovy baby, Kevin mailto:xmldude@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ++++++++++++ Cool music - http://burieddreams.com/marshan ++++++ Attitude Webzine - http://burieddreams.com/attitude XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re[2]: [xsl] Re: [xsl] RE, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl] Re[2]: [x, Julian Reschke |
RE: [xsl] namespace issue, DPawson | Date | [xsl] RE: [xsl] Re: [xsl] Re[2]: [x, Julian Reschke |
Month |