Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:55:20 GMT |
> Raise a comment on xpath-comments, and it will get back on the agenda. I will, i've even subscribed to that list (to save Max forwarding my posts by hand) But I'm currently making comments on Xquery (as you've seen over on xml-dev:-) Incidentally it's a real pain that each of these drafts has a different comment address. From a W3C working group perspective things may be split up between the different groups, but from an outsider's perspective it is just one big interlinked collection. (I'd also make this comment on one of the official comment lists but i'm not sure which one it should be on....) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Max Froumentin |
[xsl] Re: xpath2 functions returnin, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] . in for, David Carlisle |
Month |