Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: Max Froumentin <mf@xxxxxx> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 13:50:57 +0100 |
You wrote: > Incidentally it's a real pain that each of these drafts has a > different comment address. From a W3C working group perspective > things may be split up between the different groups, but from an > outsider's perspective it is just one big interlinked collection. Is it because you find your comments answered differently according to which list you send them to? If so are you suggesting creating one big XMLQuery/XPath/XSLT mailing list for general discussion, comments? > (I'd also make this comment on one of the official comment lists but > i'm not sure which one it should be on....) If it's something to do with administrivia/organisation feel free to send it to me directly (but I'm sure you knew that already). Max. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Re: . in for, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] the problem with include and , Matt G. |
Month |