|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT? From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:23:41 +0100 |
Hi David,
>> I'm surprised no one brought up XQuery; mind you, it doesn't have
>> templates, I suppose, so it doesn't quite fit the bill...
>
> surely you weren't suggesting that anyone would actually like
> xquery's looks like xml but isn't syntax?
No, but I do have a *bit* of a soft spot for XQuery's *non-XML*
element/attribute creation syntax, especially since it looks so
similar to RELAX NG:
element foo {
attribute bar { 'baz' }
}
If XQuery dropped the pseudo-XML and adopted XSLT's processing
paradigm, they could be onto a winner ;)
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Extending Java Classes in XSL, Kurt Cagle |
| Re: [xsl] HTML to XML via XSL ?, Geoff Hankerson | Date | RE: [xsl] [ANN] Announcing ActiveSt, DPawson |
| Month |