| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:33:51 +0100  | 
to be represented as element p output "%c" As I assume you know, that isn't abreviated XSLT it's unabreviated omnimark I think having two different languages use almost the same syntax would be even more confusing wouldn't it? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Extending Java Classes in, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Abbreviated form of XSLT?, Passin, Tom | 
| [xsl] attempting a preceding-siblin, Carrie Kaufman | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT Processor - root nod, Jeni Tennison | 
| Month |