Subject: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:26:22 +0100 |
heh, don't get depressed ! First until XSLT-2.0 is complete one should not "discard" it, maybe providing more feedback is needed.
In the meantime EXSLT is one way to label those "common" extensions. I understand that Michael want to focuse
on XSLT-2 development. Maybe someone can simply write the patch needed
to get Saxon to implement exslt:document, based on the existing Saxon
extension (which I implemented too) this should not be too hard. Having
EXSLT widely deployed will give the XSL group the time to finish XSLT-2
and XPath-2.
-- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Daniel Veillard | Thread | xslt2 comments (was: [xsl] N : M tr, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif | Date | RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay |
Month |