Subject: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:10:58 +0100 |
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:19:23PM +0000, David Carlisle wrote: > > The dependancy on W3C XML Schemas makes it very very unlikely for me. > > You don't want to implement it, and I don't particularly want to use it > (for the same reasons). It's a shame as it would have been nice to have > standard multiple output, the demise of result-tree fragments and regexp > support. (in fact just those three and nothing else would have been > worth specifying an xslt2 for, XSLT2 (and especially Xpath2) is mainly > just depressing reading after those much anticipated highlights. heh, don't get depressed ! First until XSLT-2.0 is complete one should not "discard" it, maybe providing more feedback is needed. In the meantime EXSLT is one way to label those "common" extensions. I understand that Michael want to focuse on XSLT-2 development. Maybe someone can simply write the patch needed to get Saxon to implement exslt:document, based on the existing Saxon extension (which I implemented too) this should not be too hard. Having EXSLT widely deployed will give the XSL group the time to finish XSLT-2 and XPath-2. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif |
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Kurt Cagle | Date | Re: [xsl] Grouping issue - multiple, Francis Norton |
Month |