Subject: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:19:23 GMT |
> The dependancy on W3C XML Schemas makes it very very unlikely for me. You don't want to implement it, and I don't particularly want to use it (for the same reasons). It's a shame as it would have been nice to have standard multiple output, the demise of result-tree fragments and regexp support. (in fact just those three and nothing else would have been worth specifying an xslt2 for, XSLT2 (and especially Xpath2) is mainly just depressing reading after those much anticipated highlights. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Daniel Veillard |
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Daniel Veillard | Date | [xsl] XPath question, cknell |
Month |