Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:59:43 -0500 |
I'm still of the opinion that the query crowd should take their schema and go find another sandpit to play in, taking the elegant advances of XSLT/XPATH2 as an advance on prior art and available to use as needed for their own purposes.
Actually, XQuery is going to have two levels of conformance as well. There are people on the XQuery side of the fence who aren't interested in schemas either. And we wouldn't be doing schema support in XSLT unless there were major vendors like Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM who claim that their users are clamouring for it.
--- www.simonwoodside.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif |
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, David Carlisle |
Month |